Don’t you know that it’s always wrong to generalize about people?? Unless you’re depicting them falsely as victims… in that case it’s compulsory. This is the new politically-correct America.
Yuck. I can’t imagine something more of a turnoff than a submissive man aka a male feminist.
Ok we get it, you want to be lead around by a collar by a fat dyke in leather...Because patriarchy.
Or alternatively it’s like
‘I want to obey my husbands every command and fully submit to his will….Because Allah‘
ISLAMISTS. USING THE FRUITS OF MODERN CIVILIZATION (TECHNOLOGY) TO CONDEMN AND TRY TO DESTROY MODERN CIVILIZATION.
Frankly, what I found most surprising is that they even know how to use computers. But then again, many very very dumb seemingly low-IQ Muslims study engineering and computer science successfully.
“In Islamic society hostility to the Jew is non-theological. It is not related to any specific Islamic doctrine, nor to any specific circumstance in Islamic sacred history. For Muslims, it is not part of the birth pangs of their religion, as it is for the Christians. It is rather the usual attitude of the dominant to the subordinate, of the majority to the minority, without the additional theological and therefore psychological dimension that gives Christian anti-semitism it’s unique and special character.
Anti-Israel activists are some of the most racist people I know of. They excuse and rationalize murderous barbaric acts of terror on behalf of Arabs, such as suicide bombings, murder of children and babies, beheadings and rocket fire at civilian targets, yet hold Jews up to the highest moral standard and condemn them for building houses.
You know the real reason these people always destroy everything, is because they are insecure and acutely aware of how inadequate they are relative to the civilized world. Islamdom basically has an inferiority-complex. Modern Muslims know that Muslims could not and will not ever create something so amazing and advanced as the pyramids, the sphinx or the Buddhas of Bamiyan(all of which they have destroyed or actively seek to destroy). They know that they are incapable of creating an empire that will stand for thousands of years after the people have become extinct. They know the best thing they have ever created was a plain black cube, and a dome of rock overtop of the Jewish temple mount. They are so ashamed of their inferiority that they destroy or try to cover up everything beautiful and elegant in this world and try to fabricate accomplishments that they are so obviously incapable of making.
That’s why you see Muslims literally making claims so far-fetched as San Jose being named after Hussein. Modern islamdom is utterly irrelevant, and so they just simply pretend that no other culture has done anything remarkable either, and if they have, Muslims pretend that they actually did it and it was stolen from them. That’s why you hear Saudis saying that American scientific achievements were literally stolen from Muslims in an elaborate conspiracy. That’s why you hear Muslims claim that they can make it to space. Their culture is in such denial of its inferiority that it’s literally convinced it’s own people that they are proud and esteemed. But they’re not. They are irrelevant. Simply irrelevant.
The animal rights activist and the Islamist have something in common which the former probably isn’t willing to admit even to them-self. I realized today for the first time that I am actually quite able to understand how an Islamist thinks, every time that i walk into a restaurant and sorely wish that they were only allowed to sell vegan products. Just like the Islamist who genuinely rejoices to imagine the world being forced to resign itself to Islamic rule, so too do I rejoice in the idea of the world being forced to become vegan.
One could say that the difference is that a so-called ‘animal rights activist’ such as myself(formerly) bases their world view on premises derived from objective evidence which can be either proven or disproven, while the Islamist or any other religious fundamentalist bases their world view on the premise that cannot be either proven or disproven.
The animal rights ideologogue generally bases their world view on the premises that the right to not be killed for needless purposes ought to be granted based on having a high level of sentience, or having a number of interests in continuing to live, rather than species alone and certain animals possess a high level of sentience and have a number of interest and so it follows that they ought to have the right to not be killed for needless purposes. The notion that certain animals are sentient and have interests can more or less be proven or disproven through experimentation, neurology and by a number of other ways.
The islamist or any other religious fundamentalist bases their worldview on the premises that a supernatural entity created the universe, is still alive, has a living will, desires praise by means of religious observance and in fact prefers a specific religious observance over others. This is a premise which could never be proven or disproven.
The fact is that while the religious do not require evidence for their most basic premises, the animal rights activist more or less does require some manner of evidence for their most basic premises. One ideologue requires some sort of evidence to corroborate their beliefs while the other ideologue starts with an absolute premise which they are unwilling to even question.
Strongly held beliefs based on evidence or not, translate into intolerance of opposing ideas. For example, the belief that biological evolution occurred and is occurring translates into extreme intolerance in the scientific community, of beliefs which stipulate that life was created by an intelligent creator. The former belief is of course based on a huge amount of evidence.
Indeed belief should be proportional to the evidence, but that is often not entirely the case with ideologies. When emotions, traditions, pride in as well as loyalty to the ideological community come into play, strength of belief is often not held proportional to the evidence, and counter-evidence is disregarded or explained away. This is surely even the case when it comes to the animal rights ideology. I sincerely doubt that if evidence came to light that animals were in fact as Descartes described, nothing more than animated machines, individuals in the animal rights community would abandon their ideology. Much of this hypothetical rigidity of belief has to do with their personal emotional reaction to animal suffering, as well as the sense of community they most likey find with other like-minded individuals and the sense of self-worth they derive from adhering to their ideology. Still, more or less, animal rights activists will surely insist that they vastly differ from religious fundamentalists in their supposed adherence to and reliance on evidence to corroborate their beliefs. For the most part they the animal rights ideologues would seem to rely more so than the religious ideologues on scientific and physiological evidence, but the two ideologies do in fact bare similarities in the strength of their convictions, and their insatiable desire to impose their worldview on others. The true believer in animal rights ideology wants to force the world to be vegan just as badly as the Islamist wants to force the world to subject to Islamic rule. The fact that the animal rights activist may have more evidence to base their belief in animal rights on is beside the point.
The idea that Islam is not racist or discriminatory is laughable. Hadith; vol.9:162,163: Muhammad warned that dreams of black women meant disease was forthcoming. Black Muslims today are so uninformed that they don’t even understand that Muhammad had many black slaves and called them raisin heads (Hadith vol.1:662, vol.9:256).
Islam is responsible for the death of over 120 million black Africans and over 80 million Hindus. Go to the most islamically run country on this earth, Saudi Arabia where black men are literally called abd meaning slave and are second class citizens. Under sharia non Muslims are humiliated and discriminated against and disallowed from even building their houses of worship or proselytizing.
If you would like to see an active apartheid state go to Saudi Arabia where human slavery is still alive and where non Muslims are not even allowed to enter Mecca. There’s literally a special non Muslim highway in Saudi Arabia. So please stop selling this bullshit that islam is not racist. No one who has studied Islam is buying it.
Mohammed was a racist himself and Muslims started the black slave trade which still exists today behind closed doors in north Sudan, Saudi Arabia and elsewhere. Some Muslim scholars to this day call for a return to slavery. Sharia is an utter refutation of the concept of human rights and equality among human beings. Reconcile that with yourself however you please.